<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Columbia Professor Mark Taylor&#8217;s Revolutionary Solutions For Higher Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegeisforsuckers.com/2009/04/columbia-professor-mark-taylors-revolutionary-solutions-for-higher-eduation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegeisforsuckers.com/2009/04/columbia-professor-mark-taylors-revolutionary-solutions-for-higher-eduation/</link>
	<description>The FIRST College Guide You Should Read</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:27:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://collegeisforsuckers.com/2009/04/columbia-professor-mark-taylors-revolutionary-solutions-for-higher-eduation/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegeisforsuckers.com/?p=222#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>I agree with your sentiment when you say that:
&quot;I&quot;m not saying that we shouldn&#039;t study subjects that benefit us individually. But perhaps, as a whole, we should continue to include more updated, problem-solving programs and procedures so we do not fall into to an academic rut.&quot;

The university is a human-created system, and it should be designed to bring us the most benefit possible.  Creating networked departments oriented toward problem solving could be a really good way to bring more benefit.

But I think Taylor, while he has good intentions and a solid diagnosis, sullies his prescriptions with the ideology of the free market.  The university isn&#039;t simply a factory that needs to be more efficient.  I think abolishing departments, tenure and other such things would have a bad effect on open inquiry.

I wrote a longer reaction here:

http://www.whyweworry.com/blog/2009/06/25/restructuring-humanities/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your sentiment when you say that:<br />
&#8220;I&#8221;m not saying that we shouldn&#8217;t study subjects that benefit us individually. But perhaps, as a whole, we should continue to include more updated, problem-solving programs and procedures so we do not fall into to an academic rut.&#8221;</p>
<p>The university is a human-created system, and it should be designed to bring us the most benefit possible.  Creating networked departments oriented toward problem solving could be a really good way to bring more benefit.</p>
<p>But I think Taylor, while he has good intentions and a solid diagnosis, sullies his prescriptions with the ideology of the free market.  The university isn&#8217;t simply a factory that needs to be more efficient.  I think abolishing departments, tenure and other such things would have a bad effect on open inquiry.</p>
<p>I wrote a longer reaction here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whyweworry.com/blog/2009/06/25/restructuring-humanities/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whyweworry.com/blog/2009/06/25/restructuring-humanities/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

